- » Law School
- » 1L Classes Outlines
- » 2L Classes Outlines
- » 3L Classes Outlines
- » Case Briefs
- » Bar Exam Materials
- » Free Legal Forms
- » Criminal Law
- » Bankruptcy Law
- » DUI/DWI Issues
- » Employment Law / EEOC
- » Divorce & Family Law
- » Immigration Law
- » Real Estate Law
- » Workers Compensation
- » Tax Law
- » Wills/Trusts/Estates Law
- » Environmental Law
- » Foreign Laws & Legal Sources
- » Insurance Law
- » Securities Law
- » Litigation Practice & Procedure
- » International Law
- » Admiralty
- » Alternative Dispute Resolution
- » Class Actions
- » Constitutional Law
- » Construction
- » Cyberlaw & E-Commerce
- » Education Law
- » Financial Crisis Litigation
- » Mass Torts and Procedure
- » Professional Malpractice
- » Military Law
- » Native American Law
- » Social Security Disability
- » Products Liability & Toxic Torts
- » Privacy Law
- » Pension & Benefits
- » Municipal Government
- » International Trade
- » Health Care
- » Commercial & Contracts Law
- » Business Law
- » Corporate Law
- » Mergers & Acquisitions
- » Animal Law
- » Elder Law
- » Election Law
- » First Amendment
- » Gender Law
- » Government Benefits
- » Government Contracts
- » Homeland Security
- » Legal Ethics
- » Litigation
- » Computer Technologies Law
- » Tort Law
- » Personal Injury
- » Probate Law
- » Intellectual Property Law
- » Defective Products
- » Motor Vehicle Accidents
- » Jewish Lawyer
- » Jewish Lawyer Los Angeles
- » Jewish Lawyer New York
- » Los Angeles Lawyers
- » New York Lawyers
- » Traffic Law
- » DMV Law
- » Law School
- » 1L Classes Outlines
- » 2L Classes Outlines
- » 3L Classes Outlines
- » Case Briefs
- » Bar Exam Materials
- » Free Legal Forms
- » Criminal Law
- » Bankruptcy Law
- » DUI/DWI Issues
- » Employment Law / EEOC
- » Divorce & Family Law
- » Immigration Law
- » Real Estate Law
- » Workers Compensation
- » Tax Law
- » Wills/Trusts/Estates Law
- » Environmental Law
- » Foreign Laws & Legal Sources
- » Insurance Law
- » Securities Law
- » Litigation Practice & Procedure
- » International Law
- » Admiralty
- » Alternative Dispute Resolution
- » Class Actions
- » Constitutional Law
- » Construction
- » Cyberlaw & E-Commerce
- » Education Law
- » Financial Crisis Litigation
- » Mass Torts and Procedure
- » Professional Malpractice
- » Military Law
- » Native American Law
- » Social Security Disability
- » Products Liability & Toxic Torts
- » Privacy Law
- » Pension & Benefits
- » Municipal Government
- » International Trade
- » Health Care
- » Commercial & Contracts Law
- » Business Law
- » Corporate Law
- » Mergers & Acquisitions
- » Animal Law
- » Elder Law
- » Election Law
- » First Amendment
- » Gender Law
- » Government Benefits
- » Government Contracts
- » Homeland Security
- » Legal Ethics
- » Litigation
- » Computer Technologies Law
- » Tort Law
- » Personal Injury
- » Probate Law
- » Intellectual Property Law
- » Defective Products
- » Motor Vehicle Accidents
- » Jewish Lawyer
- » Jewish Lawyer Los Angeles
- » Jewish Lawyer New York
- » Los Angeles Lawyers
- » New York Lawyers
- » Traffic Law
- » DMV Law
Chenery Corp. v. Sec. By: LN on May 02, 2012 09:37:02 AM |
Citation: 154 F.2d 6 (1946) Summary: Appellants filed an appeal claiming that commission had not followed the directions of the Supreme Court. Facts: Appellants filed an appeal on the order of the commission which did not allow the corporation's officers and directors from buying or selling the securities. They alleged that the commission by ordering so, did not follow the orders of Supreme Court which had directed the commission not to follow such a standard. Issue: Whether the commission was correct in outlawing the petitioners for purchasing the stocks which was permissible exercise of administrative discretion? Holding: No, the commission was not correct in outlawing the petitioners for purchasing the stocks which was permissible exercise of administrative discretion. Procedure: Judgment of the commission was reversed by the Appellate Court. Rule: The rule forbids the officers and directors of a corporation in the process of reorganization from buying and selling securities of the corporation during the pendency of the proceedings before the commission. Rationale: The commission had applied a standard which was not promulgated by the commission or legislative act and hence the decision was not correct. |
View Comments |
Leave Comment | |
After logging in, you can add comments |